Hi, {{first_name|friend}}. 👋
Welcome to Issue #253 of All About Email!
Last week, I returned to the CNIL and Garante tracking pixel story from Issues #238 and #239. The response to those two issues was bigger than I expected, and a lot of what's been written publicly since has left me with a nagging feeling that something important is being missed.
This week is my sixth guest author of the summer, Travis Hazlewood! Travis first appeared as a guest last summer with some serious Monkey Island feels and one of my most popular issues of this year!
He’s back with another treasure trove of an issue.
Let’s go, Travis! 👇
285 Free Prompts to Save Time
Your inbox isn't the problem. Neither are your meetings. It's the hours you spend on work AI could do in minutes.
285 copy-paste prompts: built for email, meetings, admin, and delegation. Each one has a clear role, a specific task, and a defined output.
No setup. No prompt engineering. Just copy, paste, and get your time back. Free when you subscribe to Mindstream.
What’s it take to improve click rates?
🚨 Like most marketers, you likely focus on important things like content and promotion choices…but you may be missing something you wouldn’t expect:
Your audience’s engagement psychology.
Over the last few months, I manually pulled apart real campaigns, account by account, send by send, hunting for what actually affects clicks.
💡 And what I found was surprising…not just because trends exist, but because the biggest trend is that the exceptions are also their own trends.
So, before you waste another minute changing the colour of your button, let’s see if you even need a button there in the first place.
Key findings from my research around click-rate trends
Note: “Primary CTA” references the major CTA focal point of the content, usually the first button, while “Secondary CTA” references any other CTAs that follow
1) Above the fold is one of the few principles that holds
The pattern was remarkably consistent:
📊 For most senders, 70-95% of clicks occur on the Primary CTA, even when multiple Secondary CTAs are present.
It is so consistently present, even for lacklustre campaigns, that one could say the Primary CTA drives more of the campaign's click performance than all Secondary CTAs combined.
There are exceptions where I saw the gap shrunken between Primary and Secondary but never below Primary representing 30% of clicks.
2) Above-the-fold is not necessarily above the fold
🚨 Interestingly enough, as I investigated those cases where Primary CTA clicks were 70-95% of total campaign clicks, I found many Primary CTAs were not actually visible upon email open. (aka, not “technically” above the fold).
What was more common than not:
Large hero images as the only thing initially visible at open
A similarly sized text block that followed it
A relevant CTA button after all of that
(AKA, it took almost two full scrolls to get to the button)
And those campaigns performed just as well, seeing the same/similar click rates and distributions across Primary vs Secondary…
💡 Meaning, if you can get someone to open your email, they will likely give you up to that first button before deciding whether to continue or abandon the email.
3) CTA formats perform differently for Primary vs Secondary CTAs
Most people think either buttons or images work better in general, but that doesn’t appear to be the case.
In many cases, link format preferences appear almost completely opposite for Primary vs Secondary CTAs.
For Primary CTAs, buttons performed better on average than images
Conversely, for Secondary CTAs, images perform better on average
And in the exception cases, Primary and Secondary CTAs trend consistently with a format preference relative to their own grouping.
🚨 The most important piece here isn't whether you should or shouldn’t use buttons, but that your audience is engaging with you in a trend you can predict and should adjust to.
4) “Too many links” is just a presentation problem
💡 There is a deliverability caveat: More external domains in your content “can” mean more reputation risk.
That said, senders with strong sending practices can routinely include 20+ links with zero issue. Reputation beats a link-count caveat every time.
As for the myth that too many links kill click rate, the only reason I’ve found is messy content formatting:
Multiple links above the fold performed just fine as long as the first piece of content stayed singular and skimmable.
Below the fold, it gets even easier, sometimes to the point where the sky’s the limit (though don’t expect everyone to scroll through 100 links).
I've observed (across multiple senders and industries) the last CTA in a multi-column, multi-row block outperform every Secondary CTA above it.
Presentation is basically the only limitation for Secondary CTAs here…
One interesting thing: Increasing the number of Secondary CTAs cannot save a weak-performing Primary CTA. Sure, they can nudge your numbers a bit…
💡 But in subscribers' minds, Secondary is always secondary.
5) Secondary CTAs are a treasure trove of information
Primary CTA performance is quite binary in what it can tell you (aka, it either does or does not go over well). Helpful, but only after you do a full-pitch with it.
Secondary CTAs are a different matter entirely.
🧠 Clickers at this level are more intentional and often show (when multiple Secondary CTAs are present) to be more obvious in their interests.
This makes Secondary CTAs the best place to test ideas for later Primary focuses:
Should you focus on accessories or new dresses?
Which blog content do they prefer?
Do your subscribers like how-tos, real-world testimonials, or trivia/games?
Secondary CTAs can tell you that.
💡 If a majority were willing to scroll past other content to click a specific one, you can be more confident there's a genuine interest signal.
How to put these into action
I plan to do a follow-up on this piece discussing some other interesting trends I’ve observed, but for now this will have to suffice.
Alright, enough theory. Here's what to actually do with it:
Make sure your Primary and Secondary content pieces are clean, well-defined, and skimmable.
Test whether Primary Content earns the same click when immediately available at open or not.
Hyperlink using different formats to understand your audience’s preferences for Primary vs Secondary CTAs.
Include more Secondary content options with diverse options related to content types, formatting, and more.
Use what you learn to inform personalisation, content ideas, and your CTAs in future campaigns.
🧠 Do this for a couple of months and see what happens.
You’ll find that starting with your feet on the ground is actually the fastest way to get your content to fly.
And when you finally reach the clouds, please ping me on LinkedIn. I’d love to hear what you found.
✅ Whatever you got out of this, at least you can finally stop wasting time picking colours on buttons that didn’t have to be there in the first place.
Travis manages email and SMS deliverability at Ortto (now part of Canva), and has spent the better part of a decade keeping billions of emails landing where they're supposed to.
His motto, "Earn the inbox...then earn more in it", is built on the idea that strong deliverability drives conversions.
Like what you just read? Check out his twice-a-month LinkedIn newsletter, Inboxicated.
Before You Go, {{first_name|friend}} - Some Of My Thoughts
A big thank you to Travis for this week’s guest post, and I will definitely be reading his follow-up piece in his own newsletter. 🎉
🚨 If there's one number to remember from this piece, it's this: your Primary CTA is doing almost all the work.
A few things worth considering on your next sends:
Stop assuming "visible at open" = "gets clicked." A big hero image up top doesn't seem to cost you clicks on the button below it; people scroll further than we give them credit for.
Don't default to one CTA style everywhere. Buttons and linked images aren't interchangeable, and which one wins seems to depend on whether it's your main ask or a supporting one.
Link count isn't the real villain; clutter is. A messy block of competing links does more damage than simply having a lot of them. **
Watch where the clicks land in your Secondary section. That's less about optimising and more about listening; it's telling you what to test as your next Primary.
💡 Try this: swap your usual CTA format for a few sends and track whether Primary vs Secondary click share actually shifts.
See you next week, {{first_name|friend}}. 👋
** (Thank God, otherwise I’d be in big trouble…my link count is usually more than 30+ links. 😮💨)
All About Email - Playlist 🎧
Every week, as I write this newsletter, I'll share the track of the moment to create an unbelievably eclectic playlist just for your inbox.
Sponsorship Opportunities
🚨 If you’re interested in sponsoring the “All About Email” newsletter, you can find all the details in this Google Doc.
Email Marketing News & Tips
This week's excellent and insightful email news & tips:
Bounce House - Gmail Reputation Data Is Dead. Now What? (Alison Gootee & Mailgun)
Omnivery has the Receipts - The click is going the way of the open. (Emailexpert)
Does It Email? - Popover/Dialog. (Mark Robbins)
Marketing - Why your Wrapped campaign should start now. (Action Rocket)
Email List Hygiene - A Step-by-Step Walkthrough (With Real Verification Results). (Kickbox)
Easy Workaround - Having trouble adding users and domains in GPT V2? (Spam Resource)
Email Authentication -Email identity and the future of customer trust. (Valimail)
Catch-All vs. Invalid Emails - The Difference and How to Handle Each. (Zerobounce)
TechCrunch Reports - Klaviyo Signup Form Shared Passwords With Advertisers. (Emailexpert)
Rate-th, the Spam Rate Wraith - The Deliverab-Iliad, Chapter Eight. (Alison Gootee)
Inboxicated - Mummified Lists, Shiny-Object Syndrome, and Ted Lasso. (Travis Hazlewood)
If you have any questions about this email or email marketing, please reply, and I will get back to you as soon as possible.
I hope you have a great week! 👋





